An Engineered Minimal-Set Stimulus for Periodic Information Leakage Fault Detection on a RISC-V Microprocessor
PaperFirst seen 7/13/2026
Last seen 7/13/2026
Evidence 11 chunks
NEIGHBORHOOD
No graph connections found for this entity yet. It may appear in future ingestion runs.
explore full graph →RELATIONSHIPS
39 connectionsThe paper uses fault injection to test detection capabilities.
The paper uses the Fault Injection Manager to control fault injection experiments.
The paper uses the Fault Emulation Engine to collect fault data.
The paper uses Emulation ROM Side Loading to rapidly load binary executables for testing.
The paper introduces the Fault Trigger Binary Executable as a minimized set of instructions for fault detection.
The paper introduces the Fault-Run-Cycle-Based FTBE as one of two methods for generating the binary executable.
The paper mentions Access-Control Extension as a related fault detection method.
The paper uses the Potato RISC-V processor as the target microprocessor for experiments.
The paper uses the AES algorithm as the cryptographic workload to evaluate fault detection.
The paper uses DFT scan chains for fault injection and counter access.
The paper introduces the ATPG-Based FTBE as the second method for generating the binary executable.
The paper uses the Wishbone bus as the interconnect for the Potato SoC.
The paper proposes a hardware Periodic Built-In-Self-Test methodology.
The paper uses ATPG methodology to generate binary executables for fault detection.
The paper uses counter-based node monitoring infrastructure for fault detection.
The paper evaluates the RCBE for fault coverage and latency performance.
The paper evaluates the ATPG-Based FTBE for fault coverage and latency performance.
The paper defines and focuses on severe faults that lead to information leakage.
The paper compares the overhead of its approach to the ACE technique.
The paper uses DFT infrastructure such as scan chains as part of its methodology.
The paper modifies the Potato RTL as part of the ATPG-based FTBE generation process.
The paper uses Synopsys Design Compiler for area overhead analysis of the counter circuit.
Jim Plusquellic is listed as an author of the paper.
Tom J. Mannos is listed as an author of the paper.
Brian Dziki is listed as an author of the paper.
The paper evaluates fault propagation latency for leakage scenarios.
The paper uses the Xilinx ZCU102 board as the emulation platform.
The paper uses Yosys for synthesis as part of the ATPG-based flow.
The paper uses the Fault open-source DFT toolchain for ATPG vector generation.
The paper uses PODEM test pattern algorithm for generating ATPG vectors.
Idris O. Somoye is listed as an author of the paper.
The paper uses the RISC-V online assembler to convert instructions into RV32I binaries.
The paper uses a SystemVerilog testbench to extract processor state at fault-triggered cycles.
The paper uses the ASAP7 standard cell library for overhead synthesis.
The paper uses the osu035 standard cell library for ATPG netlist synthesis.
The paper evaluates the Coremark benchmark as a comparison binary for fault coverage and latency.
The paper references evaluations of Self-Assertion-Based Countermeasures for fault detection comparison.
The paper mentions DIVA as related work for fault detection.
The paper uses FPGA emulation for fault injection experiments.