Skip to content
STIMSMITH

DeepVerifier: Learning to Update Test Sequences for Coverage-Guided Verification

Paper
First seen 6/12/2026
Last seen 9/15/2026
Evidence 14 chunks

NEIGHBORHOOD

No graph connections found for this entity yet. It may appear in future ingestion runs.

explore full graph →

RELATIONSHIPS

32 connections
DeepVerifier introduces → 100% 3e
The paper introduces DeepVerifier as a novel coverage-guided test generation framework.
Yuntao Lu authored by → 100% 2e
Yuntao Lu is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Chen Bai authored by → 100% 2e
Chen Bai is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Yuxuan Zhao authored by → 100% 2e
Yuxuan Zhao is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Ziyue Zheng authored by → 100% 2e
Ziyue Zheng is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Yangdi Lyu authored by → 100% 2e
Yangdi Lyu is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Mingyu Liu authored by → 100% 2e
Mingyu Liu is listed as a co-author of the paper.
Bei Yu authored by → 100% 2e
Bei Yu is listed as a co-author of the paper.
BERT mentions → 100% 2e
The paper mentions BERT as a prominent pre-trained language model in NLP.
GPT mentions → 100% 2e
The paper mentions GPT as a prominent pre-trained language model in NLP.
RoBERTa mentions → 100% 2e
The paper mentions RoBERTa as a prominent pre-trained language model in NLP.
PalmTree mentions → 100% 2e
The paper mentions PalmTree as a prior assembly language representation model.
RTL uses → 90% 2e
The paper uses RTL models of processors as the design artifact being verified.
Simulation-Based Verification compares with → 90% 2e
The paper compares DeepVerifier against simulation-based verification approaches.
force-riscv uses → 100% 2e
The paper uses FORCE-RISCV as the random instruction stream generator for producing test sequences.
Coverage-Guided Verification uses → 100% 2e
The paper proposes and uses coverage-guided verification as the central framework approach.
Bayesian Network mentions → 100% 1e
The paper mentions Bayesian networks as a prior ML approach to test sequence generation.
coverage metrics uses → 100% 1e
The paper uses coverage metrics as quantitative indicators to guide the verification process.
machine learning for test generation uses → 95% 1e
The paper uses machine learning techniques to address test generation challenges in hardware verification.
LSTM for instruction sequence modeling uses → 80% 1e
The paper discusses LSTM-based sequence modeling as a prior approach that DeepVerifier improves upon.
Functional Verification uses → 100% 1e
The paper addresses functional verification of RISC-V processor designs as its primary application domain.
RISC-V uses → 100% 1e
The paper uses RISC-V as the target architecture for its verification framework.
static formal analysis uses → 85% 1e
The paper discusses static formal analysis as an existing approach compared to the proposed DeepVerifier method.
Synopsys VCS uses → 100% 1e
The paper uses Synopsys VCS as an RTL simulator to capture coverage scores from test sequences.
Verilator uses → 100% 1e
The paper uses Verilator as an RTL simulator to capture coverage scores from test sequences.
BART mentions → 95% 1e
The paper mentions BART as a prominent deep pre-trained language model in NLP.
Concolic Testing compares with → 85% 1e
The paper discusses concolic testing as a competing semi-formal method for test generation.
Coverage-Guided Fuzzing compares with → 85% 1e
The paper discusses coverage-guided fuzzing as a related competing approach for hardware verification.
Bayesian network for coverage modeling compares with → 85% 1e
The paper discusses Bayesian network approaches as prior ML methods for coverage modeling.
artificial neural network for test acceleration compares with → 85% 1e
The paper discusses prior ANN-based methods for test acceleration as related work.
Concolic Testing mentions → 100% 1e
The paper mentions concolic testing as a semi-formal verification method.
static formal analysis mentions → 100% 1e
The paper mentions static formal analysis as an alternative verification approach.