ITL
ToolITL is a verification language used to express formally checkable processor properties and ISA-style descriptions. In the cited ISS-generation flow, ITL property suites model architectural state, instruction effects, interfaces, and reset behavior, and can be translated into C++ instruction set simulators.
First seen 5/26/2026
Last seen 5/29/2026
Evidence 7 chunks
Wiki v1
WIKI
Overview
ITL is used as a verification language for processor property suites. In the cited work, properties written in ITL describe design transitions and output behavior; when verification and completeness checking succeed, the property suite forms a model of the verified design. This model can be exploited to generate an executable simulator.[C1]
Property structure and abstraction
NEIGHBORHOOD
No graph connections found for this entity yet. It may appear in future ingestion runs.
explore full graph →RELATIONSHIPS
7 connectionsThe paper uses ITL (Interval Temporal Logic) as the property specification language.
Architectural style properties are formulated in the ITL language.
ITL supports the use of VHDL operators in temporal expressions.
ITL is the language used to express properties in interval property checking.
ITL implements temporal logic for describing synchronous system behavior.
ITL uses freeze variables to capture signal values at specific time points.
ITL supports the use of Verilog operators in temporal expressions.
CITATIONS
13 sources13 citations — click to expand
[1] ITL property suites can form a model of a verified design and be exploited to obtain a simulator. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[2] ITL properties use freeze, assume, prove, and macros; an ADD example decodes instruction fields and proves register updates. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[3] ITL processor properties describe architectural state and use mapping functions to abstract implementation details such as pipeline forwarding. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[4] Architectural-style ITL explicitly models architectural state, interfaces, next_state, interface behavior, and reset state. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[5] Architectural state is represented with user-defined VHDL record data types and ITL provides an update keyword for array or record writes. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[6] The architectural-style ITL property yields a formally checkable ISA description used as the starting point for C++ ISS generation. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[7] The generated C++ simulator class contains instruction execution code and architectural state, and translation includes generating public/private functions, state variables, C++ type substitutions, and update replacements. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[8] A wrapper calls generated simulator functions, connects the core to memories or buses, and can integrate it with commercial simulation/debugging tools. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[9] C++ generation optimizes ITL/HDL types and operations by using native C++ types and operations where possible, with optimized libraries for complex or large-bit-vector operations. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[10] The generator caches shared intermediate results and decoded instruction fields to reduce simulation runtime. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[11] ISS generation from ITL does not require a full ISA/RTL equivalence proof upfront; full confidence is achieved later through verification. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[12] For a small 5-stage pipelined processor, the generated ITL-based ISS reached 7 MIPS versus 0.22 MIPS interpretive and 14 MIPS JIT-CS. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite
[13] For an industrial processor design, the final property suite had 2,000 lines of ITL and the generated ISS reached 1.2 MIPS versus 2.5 MIPS for a commercial JIT-CS simulator. Generating an Efficient Instruction Set Simulator from a Complete Property Suite