Overview
An instruction sequence is used in the literature as a simple theoretical conceptualization of a computer program. In that framing, instruction sequence testing is proposed as a possible model for developing a theory of software testing.
Theoretical framing
The paper About Instruction Sequence Testing presents instruction sequences as a minimal program concept that can support discussions of testing without inheriting all of the ambiguity of broader software-testing terminology. Its summary explicitly states that instruction sequences are used as a simple theoretical conceptualization of computer programs, and that a theory of instruction sequence testing may serve as a model for a theory of software testing.
Putting an instruction sequence into effect
The paper Putting Instruction Sequences into Effect distinguishes execution from the broader notion of putting into effect. Its summary states that execution of an instruction sequence is a special case of directly putting into effect an instruction sequence, and that directly putting into effect includes both interpretation and execution. It also places directly putting into effect within the broader category of putting into effect, alongside indirect forms.
Use in CPU testing
Instruction sequences also appear as practical test stimuli in processor verification. In TestRIG, a randomized testing framework for RISC-V implementations, the system checks equivalence between a model and an implementation under test by generating random instruction sequences, executing the same sequences on both sides, and comparing execution traces in tandem execution.
TestRIG also introduces Direct Instruction Injection (DII), where the next instruction to be executed is supplied by the test harness rather than fetched from program memory according to the program counter. This shows a concrete testing setting in which instruction sequences are externally generated and injected as verification inputs.
Significance
Across these sources, an instruction sequence serves two complementary roles:
- a compact conceptual model for reasoning about programs and testing theory, and
- a concrete sequence of instructions used as generated input in randomized processor testing.
These roles make the concept useful in both formal/theoretical discussions and hardware-verification workflows.