Skip to content
STIMSMITH

Control and Status Registers (CSR)

Concept

Control and Status Registers (CSRs) are processor registers used to control operation and hold processor state. In ProcessorFuzz, transitions in CSR values are used as a coverage signal for processor fuzzing because they indicate entry into new processor states.

First seen 6/19/2026
Last seen 6/28/2026
Evidence 3 chunks
Wiki v2

WIKI

Control and Status Registers (CSR)

Overview

Control and Status Registers (CSRs) are registers that control processor operation and hold processor state. In the ProcessorFuzz work, CSRs are treated as a compact architectural signal for observing when execution reaches a new processor state.

Use in processor fuzzing

ProcessorFuzz introduces a CSR-transition coverage metric for hardware fuzzing of processors. The key idea is that a new transition in CSR values counts as a coverage increase. Because CSRs control and hold processor state, transitions in their values are used as evidence that the processor has entered a new state.

READ FULL ARTICLE →

NEIGHBORHOOD

No graph connections found for this entity yet. It may appear in future ingestion runs.

explore full graph →

RELATIONSHIPS

3 connections
ProcessorFuzz ← uses 100% 2e
The tool uses Control and Status Registers as guidance for fuzzing.
CSR-guided processor fuzzing ← uses 74% 1e
The CSR-guided processor fuzzing technique relies on CSRs to guide fuzzing.
The paper’s approach leverages CSRs to guide processor fuzzing.

CITATIONS

12 sources
12 citations — click to expand
[1] CSRs control processor operation and hold processor state. ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers
[2] ProcessorFuzz introduces a CSR-transition coverage metric in which a new transition in CSR values increases coverage. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[3] Transitions in CSRs are used as evidence of reaching a new processor state. ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers
[4] Prior processor-fuzzing coverage metrics were described as suffering from lack of support for widely used HDLs and misleading coverage feedback. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[5] ProcessorFuzz uses an ISA simulator to collect CSR-transition coverage, making coverage collection more efficient and HDL agnostic. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[6] ProcessorFuzz does not require instrumentation in the processor design. ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers
[7] An example ProcessorFuzz trace monitors CSR fields including mstatus, mcause, scause, medeleg, frm, and fflags. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[8] The ProcessorFuzz workflow includes seed scheduling and mutation, ISA simulation, RTL simulation, a transition map, and trace comparison, with mismatches treated as potential bugs. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[9] ProcessorFuzz was evaluated on the Rocket, BOOM, and BlackParrot RISC-V processors. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[10] ProcessorFuzz detected known bugs 23% faster than DifuzzRTL, corresponding to 1.23× faster on average in the arXiv summary. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[11] ProcessorFuzz discovered nine new bugs in total, including one in a reference model or ISA simulator. Fuzzing for Discovering Bugs and Side Channels in Processors
[12] A paper titled 'ProcessorFuzz: Processor Fuzzing with Control and Status Registers Guidance' was published at IEEE HOST 2023. ProcessorFuzz: Processor Fuzzing with Control and Status Registers Guidance - researchr publication